For weeks, police have been arriving on school campuses from New York to California on the behest of college officers, sweeping pro-Palestinian protests and arresting greater than 2,100 individuals. They’ve are available in riot gear, zip-tied college students and hauled them off, and in some high-profile cases, acted violently.
The aggressive crackdown began when Columbia College’s president, Nemat Shafik, summoned New York Police Division officers to campus in mid-April to convey an finish to the coed encampment there, someday after she promised Congress she would quash unauthorized protests and self-discipline college students for antisemitism.
That police intervention briefly dismantled the encampment, and resulted within the arrest of greater than 100 protesters on trespassing prices.
However it was additionally a strategic failure on the a part of the college administration. If the college was making an attempt to keep away from disruption, it has ended up inviting it as an alternative.
Within the days since, as help for the protesters has swelled each at Columbia and at a whole lot of faculties throughout the nation, college students have arrange encampments, organized rallies, and in just a few circumstances escalated their protests by occupying college buildings. Comparable protests even cropped up in different international locations.
In response, different universities have taken Columbia’s lead and cracked down on these protests, which search to finish faculties’ investments in corporations supporting Israel’s occupation and its ongoing assault on Gaza. Practically 50 universities have referred to as the authorities to intervene, and college students and college have been overwhelmed, tear gassed, and shot at with rubber bullets by police.
This week, when Columbia escalated its police response, the Columbia Every day Spectator, the coed newspaper, reported that “officers threw a protester down the steps … and slammed protesters with barricades.” A police officer additionally fired a gun in a campus constructing, and others threatened to arrest scholar journalists.
This may solely be described as a significant overreaction to scholar protests. However it additionally didn’t occur in a vacuum. The police response falls squarely in an extended sample of faculties suppressing pro-Palestinian activism and anti-Israel speech — one which dates again many many years. At the moment, universities aren’t making use of their guidelines equally, singling out just some scholar advocacy as unacceptable campus speech and, in some circumstances, even altering guidelines to particularly goal these protests. (The Division of Schooling is now reportedly investigating Columbia for anti-Palestinian discrimination.)
Whereas colleges together with Columbia have been fast to name in regulation enforcement, nevertheless, just a few different colleges have taken another strategy — with vastly completely different outcomes. Directors at Brown, Northwestern, and several other others negotiated with college students, allowed them to proceed protesting, and even reached offers to finish the encampments by assembly a few of the protesters’ calls for. Because of this, they’ve averted the sort of disruption and chaos unfolding at universities that referred to as the police.
These divergent outcomes amongst colleges that relied on police and people who didn’t supply an essential lesson on how universities ought to handle campus activism, whereas making certain college students’ security and defending speech.
A messy and misguided response to protests
It solely took a day and a half after the primary Columbia encampment was arrange for Shafik to name the police on April 18. In her letter to the NYPD, she wrote that she had “decided that the encampment and associated disruptions pose a transparent and current hazard to the substantial functioning of the College.” Shafik didn’t clarify what menace the encampments really posed. (Samantha Slater, a spokeswoman for the college, advised Vox that Columbia wouldn’t supply remark past Shafik’s letter.)
The protest itself was not particularly disruptive — even the police mentioned protesters have been peaceable. They didn’t get in the way in which of scholars going about their each day actions, together with attending courses.
In some ways, the demonstration at Columbia was a normal scholar protest: Demonstrators have been elevating consciousness about an issue and asking their college to do one thing about it. Encampments have been used as a protest tactic on school campuses for many years, together with in recent times, like when college students ran divestment campaigns towards fossil fuels.
Within the Nineteen Eighties, when Columbia college students protested towards South African apartheid, with just about the identical divestment calls for as the present protesters have, they blockaded a campus constructing for 3 weeks. In that case, the varsity got here to an settlement with the coed protesters reasonably than turning to the police to interrupt up the demonstration.
Whereas different campus protests traditionally have led to arrests, few have attracted such an enormous nationwide police response so swiftly. What’s going down now seems to be just like how colleges responded to anti-war protests within the Sixties and ’70s, when colleges, together with Columbia, violently cracked down on college students. And in 1970, the Nationwide Guard infamously shot at protesters at Kent State in Ohio and killed 4 individuals. But, as my colleague Nicole Narea wrote, the protests then have been extra aggressive than the encampments on campuses as we speak.
The road between authorized and unlawful protest is commonly clear. College students have a proper to protest in sure campus areas, however occupying a constructing constitutes trespassing. Enforcement of those guidelines, nevertheless, is seldom utilized equally.
In lots of circumstances, universities have alleged that the protests have been disruptive and pointed to the truth that some Jewish college students felt that the encampments created an unsafe setting for them on campus. Whereas harassment and intimidation may be causes to contain regulation enforcement, the accusations towards these protesters largely targeted on their chants and marketing campaign slogans — and in lots of circumstances wrongly conflate anti-Israel rhetoric with antisemitism. (It’s price noting that the arrested scholar protesters have largely been charged with trespassing, not harassment or violent acts.)
One of many different issues with what number of universities and officers have responded to pro-Palestinian demonstrations is that they’ve modified their protest guidelines since October 7, in some cases particularly concentrating on Palestinian solidarity teams.
At Columbia, for instance, the college issued onerous protest pointers, together with limiting the areas college students are allowed to protest and requiring that demonstrations be registered weeks upfront. Northwestern College abruptly imposed a ban on erecting tents and different constructions on campus, undermining ongoing protests. Indiana College preemptively modified its guidelines someday earlier than its college students arrange an encampment by disallowing tents and altering a decades-old rule. And in Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott issued an govt order requiring that public universities change their free speech insurance policies and singled out pro-Palestinian teams that he mentioned must be disciplined.
Such strikes have solely added gas to the protests. Additionally they put college students and college at risk, as police have performed violent arrests. (Why have been there snipers on roofs at Indiana College, anyway?)
It may well additionally finally be ineffective; after state troopers arrested college students on the College of Texas, for instance, the Travis County Legal professional’s Workplace dismissed the prison trespassing prices, saying they lacked possible trigger.
Is there a greater response to campus protests?
Not all universities have turned to the police in response to pro-Palestinian protests. People who selected a distinct path have seen a lot much less stress than people who did.
Evergreen State Faculty, for instance, agreed to its scholar calls for, promising to divest from companies profiting off human rights violations within the occupied Palestinian territories. College students agreed to finish their encampment in response.
Colleges that didn’t essentially acquiesce to protesters’ calls for took different, non-escalatory steps to quell demonstrations. Brown College, which had final yr referred to as police to disband protesters, took another strategy this time round: The college negotiated with protesters, and organizers agreed to clear the encampment earlier this week after the varsity’s governing physique introduced that it’s going to maintain a vote on divesting from corporations with ties to Israel later this yr. Northwestern College equally reached a take care of its college students by reestablishing an advisory committee on its investments.
At Michigan State College, President Kevin Guskiewicz visited the coed encampment himself and talked to the protesters about their considerations. He allowed college students to proceed the protest, as long as they utilized for a allow, which the scholars did and the college granted. Because of this, the varsity has averted the sort of disruptions seen at Columbia and different universities.
There’s a easy method for universities to deal with these protests: Deal with them like different protests.
Because the American Civil Liberties Union wrote in an open letter to varsity and college presidents, colleges can announce content-neutral guidelines and implement them — that’s, arrange pointers that don’t simply goal sure protests, corresponding to the continued pro-Palestinian ones. “The foundations should not solely be content material impartial on their face; they have to even be utilized in a content-neutral method. If a college has routinely tolerated violations of its guidelines, and instantly enforces them harshly in a selected context, singling out specific views for punishment, the truth that the coverage is formally impartial on its face doesn’t make viewpoint-based enforcement permissible,” the ACLU wrote.
At Columbia, the place the aggressive police response began a nationwide sample, it’s exhausting to argue that enforcement was impartial from the beginning of the encampment. “Simply think about these college students have been protesting, say, in solidarity with girls’s protests in Iran,” wrote Zeynep Tufekci, a sociology professor at Princeton and creator of the e-book Twitter and Tear Gasoline: The Energy and Fragility of Networked Protest, in a put up on X. “I don’t see how [the] NYPD would have been referred to as in to arrest them 36 hours into their then small protest.”
As a substitute, Columbia referred to as regulation enforcement, and now campuses throughout the nation are environments which might be unsafe for college students and college alike. Professional-Israel counterprotesters, for instance, attacked scholar encampments earlier this week on the College of California Los Angeles with pepper spray, wood planks, and fireworks. (Notably, whereas colleges acted swiftly to uproot the encampments, UCLA was an instance of how gradual they’ve been in really defending the protesters from violence.)
In the end, the second Shafik referred to as within the NYPD set the stage for a much more disruptive finish of the semester for colleges nationwide than what the unique protests would have achieved on their very own.
“From the very starting, calling within the police rapidly has been an escalatory dynamic,” Tufekci wrote on X. “It virtually all the time is.”
